The End of an Era...We are Shutting Down the Messageboard

The messageboard is now in read-only mode and no new posts or topics can be created. We will leave the messageboard up for historical purposes, but you will not be able to make new posts or comment on existing ones.

We have started a Discord server and hope that you all will join us on there. Technology has changed over the years and maintaining the messageboard has become somewhat of a pain in the butt and Discord offers many features for users, the main one being a very polished mobile app.

We really hope you all will join us on Discord and think you will like the platform. Use the invite link below to join.

https://discord.gg/skisoutheast

Converse on all ski and snowboard subjects - All things skiing, snowboarding, Q&A, gear, etc.

Please attempt to keep all comments within this forum related to skiing or snowboarding related content.

Profanity and Comments STRONGLY Monitored and enforced. (Keep it Clean! G-Rated)
Post Reply
Tmiller72
Expert
Posts: 2162
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:17 pm
Contact:

AtlSki wrote:
Hey, just wanted a quick opinion on the fastest way from atl to beech. Heading up there Friday for the weekend, and I know some of you have figured out all the shortcuts. thanks,



Fastest? A G5 maybe?
2019-20

Beech: 10
Snowshoe: 3
Alta: 2
Brighton: 1
Solitude: 1
Jackson Hole: 2
Air_Cutter
Beginner
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:57 pm

waynecash wrote:
85N to exit 78 Cheesne take a left onto 221N follow it all the way to HWY 184 in Banner Elk and take a left. It is 292 miles from Atlanta to Sugar.



It's another 15-20 mins to Beech.
Air_Cutter
Beginner
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:57 pm

AtlSki wrote:
so 221 is faster than I 26 to I 40?



Not by much, but yes.
ut_Twintip
Intermediate
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 4:32 pm

waynecash wrote:
Or the time machine from Back to the Future could help.



your gunna need an old priest and a young priest :lol:
g8erhater
Advanced
Posts: 1986
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:10 pm

waynecash wrote:
Or the time machine from Back to the Future could help.



1.21 GIGAWATTS!?
Post Reply